Once you have improved your article at the location it has been moved to, feel free to leave a message on the admin noticeboard where respondents will again evaluate your article. If standards have been sufficiently met, your article will then be moved back to its original title.
I understand that you want to earn that Avatar badge for contributing a year on the wiki and that you have to make a daily edit for that. However, can I please ask you to make at least relevant edits? Unnecessarily changing something for just the "I made an edit" purpose is not really constructive, even if your edit itself was not vandalism. I am saying this because I looked over your contributions and it became very clear that this was not the first time that you made one edit a day like that. This is not a warning or anything, this is just a friendly request to not just badge-edit.
I believe that name was mentioned on IMDb. However, since that's the only site that names the TTT waterbender as such and the fact that it is editable by all and that there isn't any source provided for that name, we do not take the name as being official and thus no page rename should be done.
Thank you Lostris; I was wondering where the name had come from.
Per what Lostris said, IMDb does not count as a verifiable source since it can be edited by anyone, and does not provide a reference for the name. This applies to any "correct" names which are only listed on IMDb; such names would require confirmation from official sources for the article to be renamed.
I just find it weird that the names seems to come from out of nowhere without any truly official source. Perhaps we could ask someone on the creator's side if that name stands true. Though until then, I'm more inclined to support the neutral name he now has as opposed to a possible false name.
I highly doubt that he'd put a name he'd heard elsewhere given he would likely know first being the VA and all. But, eh. >.<
We don't know he created it himself. It could be someone else; using IMDb and some google searching, I could probably create something just like that, and the unprofessional style of the page suggests to me it was someone else that made it.
I agree with Lostris; until we get confirmation of the name, it is better to lean on the side of caution.
Not really, it has his resume for starters. Though, granted not enough reasoning alone, I suppose. As for the "unprofessional style of the page", he's not exactly a big time actor, I'd wager it was selfmade.
Though I'm not really pushing for the change, I'm just pointing it out.
When editing, always assume good faith. No one (except for people who do vandalism of course) is intentionally trying to mess up a page so always consider what they are adding, read through it, and see if it is constructive :) Otherwise, your edits are great!