Hey, I sometimes see you adding the <br clear=all> (disregard if I wrote it wrong) to some articles. There's a new template which makes it easier to enter that, it's {{clear}}, I think that's supposed to be the new way we do that.
Bloodbender, if you see in the other articles of the past, it shows their legacy as a header three, not header two. That's not right, it should be in header three.
The newest picture of a baby saber tooth I uploaded wasn't of substandard quality.You can actually see the entire body, and it's not too far away. It wasn't distorted, unlike the previous one I uploaded
When undoing an edit, please try to include an edit summary unless the edit is very clearly vandalism. It is useful for other users to see what your reasoning was for undoing the edit, and doing so aids in communication.
It's not a problem, it's just helpful to everyone else to see what your reasoning was for undoing the edit. If your reasoning is right but you don't provide it, the original edit will likely be remade because the original user doesn't know why they are wrong. Providing a summary merely smooths the process a little more.
I've rewritten the sentence to remove the problem altogether, since it didn't look right with either of them anyway, and we cannot be sure they were extorted just because they were non benders. There may have been other reasons.
I have not been badge-editing. I have been making solid edits for a while now, considering the fact that much of the material on this wiki is either written poorly or grammatically incorrect.
Well, my edits are not poor. I am very strict when it comes to grammar and punctuation, so I would like to see some examples of my "poor edits" from you.
That does not mean that he sent the message on Korra's behalf. And, by the way, it wouldn't be "trivial" point. It would be "trivia". "Trivial" means small, or insignificant.
Guys, calm down. If you have a disagreement, fine, but try to discuss it civilly. The trivia point you are discussing is ambiguous, so opening a forum to get other people's opinion would be a better solution.
well i wont reall ygo against the edit, however past tense just means hes dead, and there is no logical point to include Fire Lord Ozai despite that not being his title anymore nor part of his name and he isnt even dead when the series ends infact he lives yeaaaars after the series concludes just sayin' but hello :3 im new, im a huge fan of the show so hope we can be friends on here :)
Hello there! I believe it is the policy of the wiki for articles to remain as in-universe as possible in the series in which it was relevant. Ozai was Fire Lord for most of ATLA, which is why he merits the title.
well if you are going by that i can kind of see the logic, but in-universe technically speaking i think is relevent that he is a former fire lord but hi there to you too :D you can call me Kaity, or Kait as the people on toriko wiki and one piece wiki usually call me :)
Nice to meet you, Kait! I can totally see where you're coming from, but its been the custom of this wiki for so long that the admins do not see the point of changing the format... regardless of the in-universe policy. BTW, welcome to the community!
thanks :D btw are templates allowed on the user pages? or what? i like spicing up my user page but idk what i cant use (outside of fan art and pictures not related to the wiki unless i use photobucket or imageshack as a imbetweener)
I don't completely agree with that. However, even if it had to be changed, you could've simply changed the sentence to: "...was able to bloodbend..." rather than creating an intensive unnecessary sentence like: had performed the feat.
I mean, sounds sooooo complex, when the correction could've been simpler.
Now with Aang, Tenzin, Jinora and Yangchen all having the N and the other four not having the N, but at the same time not having another common element in their name, I guess it won't be wrong to say: "most Airbenders have...."
To be honest, my decision would be to not include it at all. I don't like the trivia points for the other two either, since it seems like an assumption being made on only a small number of names.
But if you want to add something in, I won't remove it (assuming its not rubbish).