FANDOM

HammerOfThor

aka Thor

Discussions Moderator
  • I live in the United Kingdom
  • My occupation is Researcher
  • I am Male
An anonymous contributor
  Loading editor
  • Did you just add to your profile that you are a fan of tea? You're such a walking British stereotype. Love it :-D

      Loading editor
    • Haha.

      Just need a userbox that says "This user likes bowler hats and wears a monocle" and I'll be all set.

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Is there a source Nickelodeon is working on it? I think there's a possibility Netflix bought the rights.

      Loading editor
    • The IGN article referenced on the page says "Netflix will partner with Nickelodeon ..". The phrase "partner with" suggests to me a greater involvement from Nickelodeon that goes beyond just Netflix buying the rights.

        Loading editor
    • That makes sense, thanks!

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Hey HoT, I saw that you undid my edit and it does appear to be standard on these kinds of articles, although I still stand that it's weird and breaks flow. According to the MoS we don't need a biographical information section, only as applies. I think it's weird that if we don't state unknowns on in-universe pages we shouldn't state them on crew/VA pages either. I'm willing to go through and remove those sections on articles tbh.

      Loading editor
    • View all 7 replies
    • I guess I just don't really see the difference in those two. I feel like it's the kind of thing where if we don't have biographical information listed, it's obvious that we don't have any that's been found. I see your argument though so I'm willing to just let the situation drop and add "no biographical information has been found" to the articles that lack it to make it consistent across the board.

        Loading editor
    • I would like to interject: we do not, on this wiki, have empty sections. A section that says "we have no more information" is an empty section. Given that this is standard across the wiki, I don't see why this has come up as an issue.

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Hey HammerOfThor, first off, long time no see! How have ya been? I noticed you spent a year living in Italy recently. That's pretty neat. Whereabouts did you go? Earlier this year I went there for the first time myself on vacation. Since it was only a week, for the most part I stayed in Tuscany. I really wanted to go to Rome, too, but didn't have the time on this particular trip.

      Loading editor
    • Hey ARG. Good to see you again too. Things are rather busy but otherwise going well. How's life treating you?

      I was living in the Abruzzo region in central Italy, about 2 hours from Rome. I didn't get to travel as much as I wanted, but I did get to see Rome and Naples. Definitely recommend both.

        Loading editor
    • Nice. I've been thinking about going back there eventually, once I have the time and money set aside.

      Life's pretty good, but hectic and busy at the same time. My hours at work got extended recently so that greatly limits my free time, but I get along with my roommates and coworkers. Trying to get out and go to the gym when possible.

        Loading editor
    • Best time to go is in the spring. It's bloody cold in the winter and as hot as anything in the summer.

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Just wondering which section you got it from? I checked on this archive but I couldn't find it on her page, so I was just wondering which entry said she was fourteen, thanks!

    Also while I'm here welcome back :D It seems we just missed each other with our returns but it's nice to see you editing again once our schedules meshed :)

      Loading editor
    • View all 19 replies
    • I checked Meng's page to see when the age was added and if a description was given. Apparently it was added by Tink sil ro dess fawn in 2010, but nobody ever questioned it. I guess it's safe to say we can remove it in this case. I'll check other characters later to see if we can remove unsourced info there as well.


      This is really something. Some of these mistakes date back to over a decade ago. A user added Appa's age as 106 because of the timeline (I still don't get what he means and then it was just left there and even modified a few times, but it seems someone decided Appa's age and then placed it because they wanted to and users agreed.

        Loading editor
    • I assume the timeline is some kind of official work, but I have no idea of knowing exactly what that is or what the source is. For some exaples it's a real headache. Many years ago Omnibender said Suki was 15 because of the avatar index, but no archives of the index have that listing. Since the only remaining link that was archived was super buggy, it's possible that it did exist that way at one point but has since been completely removed form the internet, leaving us scratching our heads.

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • You really should check out abuser of the Month

      Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Wow! So nice to have a top-notch editor such as yourself back here! Hope you'll stick around, but just wanted you to know it's definitely a nice surprise having you back HoT. Sorry I couln't stop by and say hello before; I've been extremely busy lately.

      Loading editor
    • View all 7 replies
    • It's interesting how a few years can really change one's perspective. That's why I've always been open to revisiting many topics - even if they've already been discussed.

      Oh man! That feels like ages ago! I had forgotten that blog even existed. That was a bit less than three years ago; can't believe in two months I'll have been here for four years now. Wow.

        Loading editor
    • Agreed. When you read back over your comments in previous forums and completely disagree with what you said, or realise that your argument was just complete rubbish. Shows why its stupid to be so stubbornly rooted to your opinion you don't consider the other side.

      Thought you'd like that ;)

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • Look what the cat dragged in :-D Great to see you return, HoT!

      Loading editor
    • View all 12 replies
    • I will continue looking and if I can't find anything I will ask Tono, Thailog, and/or Kettle if they have any ideas; but I guess if portability was just restricted to infoboxes it might be outside the scope of what Vanguard does.

      The family tree code is a pain to work with, but it would be nice to get it working (at least a bit) on mobile.

        Loading editor
    • Chances are that it's outside the scope of Vanguard, but on the other hand, if anyone would have any inside knowledge about whether or not there are plans for the other templates, it would be a Vanguard member :-)

        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • It's been a long time. Very long time. Sad to see you aren't an administrator yet. Totally should have been before that snub, but besides that, How are you?

      Loading editor
    • An anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message