FANDOM


Revert process 3.4

And should we consider to add more details under on "Revert process 3.4 - If agreement cannot be reached, propose your reverted change on the relevant article's comments. For more wide-reaching changes, use the War Room." to add "If agreement cannot be reached, propose your reverted change on the relevant article's comments. For more wide-reaching changes, use the War Room. This includes not to revert some of the users such as Rollback and Admins that closed the forum thread without giving a reason.", I think we should add that to the policy to make sure nobody gets that into trouble?-- King Marth 64 (talkother wikisblogs) FE4_Junior_Lord_Sprite.gif Peace_Ness.png 05:41, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

No; it should not be stated. Nothing has ever changed as for closing forums; edit summaries have never provided its own level of "reasoning." If you want reasoning, read the entire forum. Vulmen (talkEoK) 05:44, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
EDIT CONFLICT: I already did kinda read the entire thread, but I kinda think we should add that part for kinda to avoid confusion, I was going to rewrite my message.-- King Marth 64 (talkother wikisblogs) FE4_Junior_Lord_Sprite.gif Peace_Ness.png 05:50, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
I'm not saying you didn't read anything. I'm saying the process doesn't need changing as that's how it's always been. You make it sound as if 888 made a mistake in closing the last forum. No change is necessary. Vulmen (talkEoK) 05:52, June 30, 2012 (UTC)