There are still unresolved issues concerning images. For one, we haven't reached any consensus about image sizes and their use on user pages. ― Thailog 19:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Userpage images

I understand not uploading images solely for userpages, but limiting the number of images per userpage? That doesn't make sense. If an image is already in existence on the wiki, why not allow it to remain in use on userpages? --I'm The Bos - Talk - Guardian 20:47, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

How does it make sense to limit images on userpages if they are already on the wiki? --I'm The Bos - Talk - Guardian 20:58, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
Has anyone seen this? This is a pointless policy. --I'm The Bos - Talk - Guardian 20:23, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
You may get more interest in the topic by writing a blog post about it - I recommend it for policy proposals. The 888th Avatar (talk) 03:04, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

Small images

Why are all of the images so small? Aren't larger images preferable? Cevan (wallcontribs) 14:19, April 13, 2015 (UTC)

There is simply no need for the images to be any larger than they are at the moment. Size has nothing to do with quality and our images are at the highest quality available. Due to their smaller size, they will load faster, which is more beneficial for use on our pages. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 14:22, April 13, 2015 (UTC)
I suppose, although often times I'd like to see an image up closer, but as they are now I can't do that. Cevan (wallcontribs) 14:35, April 13, 2015 (UTC)
I can understand that, but I hope that you can also understand that we're not going to massively overhaul all our images and slow down page loading times just for the occasional "I'd like to see this up close". As an encyclopedic wiki, we don't cater to the visual. The images are solely meant to support the written text here. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 15:02, April 13, 2015 (UTC)