FANDOM


Earth Kingdom box This is a page archive.

Please do not add or remove any content from it. (61,761 bytes)


Iroh's Sandal

Delete Delete —It's such a minute detail, and it's no different than objects like Toph's Headband, Aang's Season One Clothes, etc. Personally, I think we need to decide where to draw the line between important and unimportant, because recent article creation has been for things that are very unimportant.Aangzula 03:57, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I'm actually rather neutral about this, but if I had to go one way, it would be keep. Team Avatar did use it to get to General Iroh, who led them to where they ended up. A Light Shining in the Darkness - Talk Dai Li Sprite 03:59, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I say keep since it was appeared in more than one episode and it lead to Team Avatar finding the Order of the White Lotus, who help them with the two final battles Powerfullest (talkcontribs) 04:06, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Per PF. The object was relevant in the series. Dcasawaang1 (talk) 04:13, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Was important in finding Iroh. VJavatar honors the fallen of 9/11 04:20, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral Neutral — While it played a role in character finding. I believe the information can easily be spread to other pages, my suggestion was a Footwear page or just merging it with Clothing. Because unless these significant uses and events can be fully typed about, the page looks pitiful and humorous. -- Bunai82 (talk) 06:51, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — After a lot of thinking, I think we should keep the information instead of the page. It can be fit in Fashion in the World of Avatar. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 06:54, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per MRtG. If I'm not mistaken, articles with little amount of content are only created if it was mentioned in Nick.com, which this isn't. Even if it is, I'm starting to doubt the wiki's article quality when we justify every minute/insignificant/unnecessary article with it. But, seeing as it served Team Avatar well, I'm all for transfering the content into FWA. It's about time we resurrect this issue, don't you think? Axiovatar Talk 07:50, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — This object has been used more and for more plot purposes that Azula's Sleeping Robe and seen in the series twice, as opposed to the Dorje which as only briefly seen in a comic. Based on this, I think that Iroh's sandal deserves a page. ----Hakoda-chao4RageOfFluffy 09:38, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — This sandal is one of my favorite objects in the series, but here's the real reason I'm keeping it: A lot of people didn't remember what the sandal was in 319. It would be good if we could just have a page to alleviate any confusion that caused, since the sandal's arc spanned over three books - some fifty episodes. TAD, theavatardemotivator - talk 11:27, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — The sandal actually does play an kind of important role in the series, actually. Zuko used it to track Iroh, twice. (: ~Pretty Much Katara In Real Life <3 (talkcontribs) 15:32, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Per above supporting reasons. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 15:54, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Per TAD. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 16:15, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — The sandal is pretty important. Aang20791 Fanons Aang DOBS Sprite 16:34, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Unnecessary. A shoe? Come on. --BlackMonkey - Talk 22:32, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

After thinking about it, you're right it has significance...but enough to have its own page, no. How about a merge?Aangzula 01:05, September 13, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete —I like the merge idea.--Katara PL SpriteBack for Korra Folks :)  Talk  Contribs  Following  01:16, September 13, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I think this article deserves to stay. As others have stated, it was pretty critical in the series. The Ultimate Waterbender 14:00, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article kept.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Avatar Manifestations

Delete Delete —This page is very small and on a minor detail in the series. Additionally, all the info is elsewhere. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 21:24, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep —I think if we edit this page enough, it can become of quality. Naruto Uzumaki + Aang Barrage 21:28, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — The issue is not with editing and quality, but with the general topic. Honestly, this page is talking about the Avatar State and is completely speculation. Therefore, it deserves deletion.Here's me.Ozai Spirte The Final BattleIroh Sprite OWL Outfit 21:31, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Like I commented on the page itself: The relevant info that page can hold is already mentioned on the pages of the individual Avatars and on the Avatar page in some sort, so there is no new information that this page can add. Sure, we can clean it up and make it a quality page, but that doesn't change the fact that is will be all repetitive information. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 21:31, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per ARG. This page really doesn't add anything. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Read my fanon! http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o82/yankeesrule4ever/santa-katara1.gif 21:33, November 16, 2011 (UTC)


Delete Delete — Per Lady + ARG. Information is already mentioned in other articles. It's not necessary to repeat it in a new one. Dcasawaang1Talk 21:35, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — per everyone; the page adds nothing that isn't already in the Avatar page. --I'm The Bos - Talk 22:10, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Merge Merge — We should merge it to the Avatar page or other pages that needed something for useful things instead of deleting it.-- King Marth 64 (talkother wikisblogs) http://i1116.photobucket.com/albums/k576/DigiPen92/th_20px-Marthsprite.gif Peace_Ness.png 22:13, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

That's the thing: All the information is already on other pages, so there is nothing new that we can add to pages that they don't already have. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 22:15, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per King Marth.Sratch My other vote.Naruto Uzumaki + Aang Barrage 22:17, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Per Lady Lostris in response to this - there is nothing to merge. Vulmen (talkEoK) 00:19, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — (1) Adds nothing new. (2) Alleviates no potential confusion. (3) Not much information.   TAD talkabclaf   22:48, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Information is repeated and basically separated to its own, unnecessary page. Looks to me like this will pass. Vulmen (talkEoK) 00:19, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Come on guys, why we gotta give up on the page that easy? I'm sure if some effort was put into it it could be a nice piece. --AvatarMonarchist 19:33, November 18, 2011 (UTC)

This has nothing to do with effort, as I am convinced that we could edit it to even A-class without problem, but the issue here is that the page holds no new information. Everything that is listed is already found elsewhere, so there is just no need for a new "duplicate info" page. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 19:37, November 18, 2011 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Its should Merged with the Avatar page. User:Caseyboy97 05:08, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Did you even read the discussion? There is nothing to merge. Why is everyone voting merge when they do not check if the information is there, nor read our replies here and respond to them? Vulmen (talkEoK) 11:36, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — The information provided on this page seems redundand as mentioned before by several others. Yu Yan Archer (talkcontribs) 12:55, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per all. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 07:21, November 25, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

The Fire Ferrets

Delete Delete — Too little information as is, and some of it seems to be speculative. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 16:49, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — My reason for tagging the page; we barely have any information on the team. We'll re-create the page later. --I'm The Bos Wall 16:50, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per KFB and Bos, we have too less information as of now. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 16:54, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — As Bos says, it can always be made again. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 17:10, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Until we have enough information to make a proper article, I'd say delete it and remake it later on HammerOfThor (wallcontribs) 17:37, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per everyone. Annawantimes (Talk) 06:26, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Fire Lady

Delete Delete — I suggest to delete this page as it is basically a page full of speculation and assumptions. I don't see the need to keep a page just for saying that we don't know thing. The only relevant information there is that Ilah is the only known Fire Lady and that Ursa would've become one if she wouldn't have been banished, but that's already listed on their respective pages as well. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 23:14, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — The article uses "likely" much more than any article should; and as you've said, much of it is speculation. In the information also tends to state things that we don't know and make false assumptions, so I say delete it. Perhaps we could create a section on the Fire Lord article about the Fire Lady title, or simply expand upon the topic a little more in the Family section? Annawantimes (Talk) 23:19, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I've just looked throug it, and the vast majority of information is only "likely" in relation to its truth. Rassilon of Old (Wall - Help) 23:57, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — But I agree with Annawan about moving some of the content into the "family" section of the Fire Lord article. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 23:59, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Agreed. Mostly speculation. Dcasawang1wall 03:25, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — At this point, it would be better suited for the Fire Lord article. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 14:23, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Bending Arena

Merge Merge — This page hold very little information as it is now, and I don't really think that there will be that much more information about the arena in specific. For that reason I propose we merge this with the existing Pro-Bending article, as the two are obviously related to each other. This is more or less the same as with Earth Rumble VI, where we have the information about the tournament and the aren combined in one article. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 14:18, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Absolutely, per Lostris. Annawantimes (Talk) 14:21, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — If we are unlikely to get any new information, then we should shift it over. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 14:23, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per Lostris. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 14:25, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — I do think we will have more information later, enough for a separate article, but for now I agree with the merge. Dcasawang1wall 14:28, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — When the series is on and we get more information, We can recreate the page. So like everyone else so far I, Kuzonkid7 (wallcontribs) 16:06, March 17, 2012 (UTC) vote merge!

Merge MergeA Light Shining in the Darkness - Talk Dai Li Sprite 16:09, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I think it is better if we keep it like that. It won't take long for more information to appear - more detailed descriptions. Also, the Bending Area is a symbol for benders, thus Amon will not like it, maybe will even destroy it. I think it should be kept as it is. Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM) 22:39, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article merged with the pro-bending article, and then deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Azula's sleeping robe

Delete Delete — I find this page to be an utmost useless one - it tells of nothing important, nothing that holds any meaning, filled with assumptions (example: very comfortable) and many more problems I am not listing. I think it is a waste of space on the wiki. If we were to add a page for every hopelessly pointless thing, we would end up with pages as Katara's eyes, Aang's nose, Sokka's teeth, etc. Plus the article is not featured (if it ever was) anymore on Nick. Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM) 22:33, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — per the previous vote we had on this. It was on nick.com so it should stay. --I'm The Bos Wall 22:47, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I hate that we've fallen into that mindset that anything on nick.com should have a page; this robe had absolutely no effect on anything in Avatar, besides keeping Azula warm at night. Oh no! She may have caught a cold if not for this robe! Receiving a mere mention on Nick.com does not mean that this page isn't pointless. It is pointless. The only reason we have it is because Nick.com mentioned it.Firelordazula signatureAzula sprite23TeeAzula Sprite 22:53, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — We have maintained articles about subjects featured on Nick.com for some time. Their being on Nick.com establishes their notability and thus disqualifies them from being deleted. This would set an unacceptable precedent and potentially undo a lot of work that Avatar Wikians have done over the past few years. The 888th Avatar (talk) 23:03, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

It appears that I've made an assumption too quickly based on the apparent rationale of the last vote about this page. I'm withdrawing my vote and going back to my usual practice of staying away from these debates. The 888th Avatar (talk) 11:58, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I understand what those who are in favor of deletion are saying, but if it was featured through nick.com, it should stay. If we are to remain the top source for ATLA/LoK info, we need to keep everything that's official. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 23:08, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I was unable to find this page on nick.com. With that said, this page is highly irrelevant and quite a minor detail. If it's not on nick.com, it should be erased. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 23:42, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I don't see what the point in deleting it is. It has a lot more information on it than some of the articles we have here. It makes sense to have information that nick.com has, because they're the official A:TLA source. That information is canon, therefore I think it should stay. —Haybernathy talk http://i1235.photobucket.com/albums/ff433/Toph_Lover/KataangSprite.png 23:10, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Per wjxhuang, it was once on nick.com, so I don't see a reason to remove it. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 09:48, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Maybe it used to be featured on Nick.com; however, now it isn't anymore, so that takes away its protection again deletion. The page is widely irrelevant, so if it's no longer on Nick.com, I say we get rid of it as well. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 10:54, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I think a line really needs to be drawn with articles in Nick.com, it's a good place to draw information from, but we don't need to create an article for every single one they do. Like Matey said, assumptions are common in the article, and like others have said; it doesn't have any effect on the events of the series. I don't really see a reason to keep it. Annawantimes (Talk) 22:39, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — This is not a relevant article and was never in Nick.com. Dcasawang1wall 11:10, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Even if it was on Nick.com at one point, I don't see that as a reason to have an article here. We should document all the information on nick.com, but we don't always need the same format for keeping that information. I honestly don't see why we should make a page for something when our better judgement says its too minor a detail to be a page simply because it used to be documented in such a way elsewhere. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 23:51, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — It is a really minor detail and doesn't add much to the wiki or give the reader any more information on it than what they probably already knew about the article of clothing. The Ultimate Waterbender 23:38, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Candidates for Speedy Deletion Talk

Delete Delete — Why does this page exist, when we have this page? By my understanding, "speedy deletion" is for when its so obvious that it doesn't need to be discussed and regular deletion is for where you discuss a page that's worth discussing. If its not worth discussing, there doesn't need to be a place to discuss it. Furthermore, people might not know which page to put it on if its borderline. Its confusing and contradictory to have both pages. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 23:48, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Indeed. Full support.Firelordazula signatureAzula sprite23TeeAzula Sprite 00:01, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — We shouldn't use it, but I think we should keep the old discussions. Dcasawang1wall 00:50, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — I think we should keep the page, but not there. Keep it on this page as an archive and then delete that page as it may indeed induce confusion. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 00:52, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — I agree that it really doesn't need to exist in its current place, but it should most definitely be archived. Annawantimes (Talk) 00:54, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Though if it must be done, we can find a way to keep the old discussion I suppose. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 00:57, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Get rid of it completely. I believe that people shouldn't find excuses to keep pages because (etc.) because "it was voted as such in 2009". Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM) 23:34, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — My thought is that keeping the page is for the sole purpose of reference, thus I'm all for merging it. Axiovatar Talk 12:52, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article archived here, and then deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Foreign language adaptions

Merge Merge — I see what the author of this page is trying to do, but I don't think it merits a page -- rather, I think it could be merged into Avatar: The Last Airbender. Thoughts? KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 01:37, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I would merge it in its current form, but if this page is expanded upon, it could become quite long and might clutter the main page of the show. Therefore, I think it should remain its own page. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 01:40, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article kept.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Pheasant squirrel

Delete Delete — Everything on the page is utter speculation; the behaviour and place in the World of Avatar sections are nothing but speculation. Also, the creature is mentioned in one statement, we can't go making pages for everything mentioned in one or two statements. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 11:41, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — But there are pages for the Spiderfly, Two-headed rat viper and Spidersnake, and even more speculation based pages for Spider cat and Walrus yak. I personally don't find any reason to delete the page, and though I don't mean to justify assumptions, the ones on the page are reasonable and are based on direct quotes from the comic. If it does end up being deleted, however, we should discuss the other fauna pages similar in nature as well (the ones I listed before, among many others). Waterbending emblem Water Spout

Then I suppose we should discuss about deleting them all... – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 11:58, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I vote for keeping it, removing all speculative information. Dcasawang1wall 12:02, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — While purely speculative details should be removed, I don't believe it's necessary to discuss the deletion of any of these pages. All of them would be notable from an in-universe point of view (a tradition we keep). I also think that statements like "it is an insect most likely based on the common spider and house fly" can simply become "it is an insect based on the common spider and house fly" without too much fuss. I mean, are we really going to suggest that the spiderfly has got nothing to do with spiders or flies? I'm just saying that it's a mistake to take these things too far. The 888th Avatar (talk) 12:09, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Merge it with the fauna page. The only reason I am voting for this to be kept (but still merged) is because it is a living thing that is a part of the Avatar universe. Otherwise it plays no significant part in the series at all. If it were a worm-bat (or something else), it would still make no difference, and on all the places it was mentioned, it would most probable make sense. So, playing no important role, but being living is what defines my vote.

P.S.: The example of something that has to be carefully changed and plays a somewhat significant part in the series is the Badgerfrog. It was used twice in the Western Air Temple stay of team Avatar and the fact that it lives in the region and crooks is what makes it important. Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM) 01:05, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — There may be lots of speculation, but I believe that most of the information has a good basis. The information that is purely speculation should be removed, but I see no reason to delete it. Annawantimes (Talk) 01:10, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Funny how opinions differ from time to time, especially when they're easily influenced by a single individual. While articles with reasonable information are deleted (recently), minute and insignificant fauna pages such as this are kept. Personally, I would also question those mentioned by WS. But I have a hunch that it'll most probably be cast aside anyways, so I'll vote for a merge with the fauna page instead, per MateyY. Axiovatar Talk 13:05, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — with the fauna page per Axio and Matey. I support 888's statement that we shouldn't go an a deletion spree, but we shouldn't keep speculation pages around either. We've always striven to be objective in our pages, to only list things that have been confirmed, than why keep a page around with only likely claims? The only thing we can be sure of is that the animal is based on a pheasant and a squirril, and that it was mentioned by Zhao in the comic. That can be done in one sentence on the fauna page as well. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 13:11, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Because although it is mentioned with very little detail, it holds that little more information into the life of Avatar. --Raffyjack123 (wallcontribs) 13:23, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article kept.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Kirachu Island

Delete Delete — This page has no affect on anything. It was mentioned by Sokka in one of the last comics during Book 2 released in the Lost Adventures (it was never in the series). The comic was also released in the Nick Magazine. But what affect does this island have? It isn't even featured by Nick. It's not even realistic to have an article about it. If I copy all the info on the page, it would be about as long as my comment. And it also just says that is mentioned by Sokka for their food. Would it matter if the island was called Fire Nation Food Island? No. So we don't need it. Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM) 12:06, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — If we have pages for fauna only mentioned once, I don't see a reason to delete this page. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 12:19, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

But isn't there a difference between mentioning and actually seeing it. This island was never seen. Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM) 12:23, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Tigerdillos and pheasant squirrels were never seen. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 12:27, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Notable from an in-universe POV; good enough for me. I think we should really be avoiding the idea of going on a deletion spree, to be honest. :P The 888th Avatar (talk) 12:44, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Per 888. It's significant enough from an in-universe POV. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 22:46, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Definitely, per wjxhuang. Annawantimes (Talk) 01:14, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Per 888 and Natsu. And Matey: Just because something was mentioned only once doesn't mean it should be deleted. --I'm The Bos Wall 01:21, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article kept.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Arctic hen

Delete Delete — Quite honestly, I'm not sure why on Earth we even have this page; the animal was mentioned once, first of all, and had absolutely no significance in the series whatsoever. That should be enough reasoning right there. However, in case more is required, the article itself is made up of an infobox, two sentences, a reference, and a "See also" section. I can't think of one legitimate reason why we should keep it.Firelordazula signatureAzula sprite23TeeAzula Sprite 18:31, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — "Notable from an in-universe POV; good enough for me." And I think it would be ridiculously inconsistent to keep some of the articles (Kirachu Island, pheasant squirrel) from the above discussions and decide to delete this one. I don't get why people just can't leave these pages alone – surely there are better things to do on the wiki. The 888th Avatar (talk) 19:23, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Per wjxhuang again, if those aren't deleted, why should this be? – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 19:32, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Per 888. The page -even though very short- is indeed in-universe. As long as it isn't packed with speculation, it is fine. Fauna pages are always going to be rather short. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 19:39, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — The page is short, but it's a type of animal, so like 888 said, its significant enough from an in-universe perspective. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 19:40, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Per everyone. It is relevant despite its length. Dcasawang1wall 20:29, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I agree with wjxhuang again on this one. Annawantimes (Talk) 14:27, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Agreed. We have articles like this. I see nothing wrong with keeping it around. The Ultimate Waterbender 15:32, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article kept.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Republic Times

Delete Delete — Where on earth is the basis for saying that this is the "official" paper? Not seen in any episodes; its status is not even justified by any official sources. And most problematically, it's in English when it's clear that English is never used in-universe. Looks more like minor promotional material to me, and we don't keep articles for that. The 888th Avatar (talk) 19:36, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

An issue was seen in ep. 2 Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM) 19:45, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I just assumed that there was some reliable source for it. Since there isn't, however, yeah. Delete it, per 888.Firelordazula signatureAzula sprite23TeeAzula Sprite 19:41, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 19:43, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — Named after Republic City. Has information on Korra's arrival and the Fire Ferrets. I think that makes it important enough. It was officially released from the Animation Insider and was seen in the second episode. I vote keep, since I believe it will become important.Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM) 19:44, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, the one seen in the episode was written in Chinese. So they aren't the same. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 19:46, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Let it be as everyone else says. It could be a translation of the actual newspaper, but I will still vote delete for now.Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM) 20:38, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Upon reviewing the episode, it is very clear that it isn't the same paper (the logo is different and it is written in Chinese like everything else in the Avatar verse), further proving 888's thought that it is good promotional material - but not Avatar universe material. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 19:47, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per 888's original statement and Lady's confirmation that the newspaper featured in the episode is a different one. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 19:50, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Agreed. This is a promo picture, not shown in the series. Dcasawang1wall 20:29, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — In the second episode of LoK, Korra was reading a news paper that is similar to the picture shown on the Republic City Times page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omar067 (wallcontribs) 22:43, 31 March 2012


Delete Delete — This article consists of a lot of speculation – what little information it has seems a bit irrelevant. We should recreate the article when we see a little more of it in the series. Annawantimes (Talk) 14:26, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Tigerdillos ''(pro-bending team)''

See here because the link refuses to work for some reason.

Delete Delete — About half of this already small article is unknowns, and they really have no history besides their match. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 13:16, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per KFB. IsabellaLover Toph-end-c4Ty Lee sprite 13:27, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I don't see any reason for this to stay. The only info it really tells you is that they were eliminated, which is on the Fire Ferrets page anyway. HammerOfThor (wallcontribs) 13:35, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Page was deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Shadowbending

Delete Delete — To make sure, this is not about the fanon page, this is a canon page based on the shadowbending featured in the comic New Recruits. However, with the exception of a sentence here and there, all the info on that page is speculation, and the relevant information is already on Analay's article. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 11:57, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per Lady Lostris. Those moves and the other info was not in New Recruits. It's just speculation. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 12:00, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Not to mention, NR and all associated info is not considered canon. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 12:03, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per everyone, especially PSUAvatar14. ― Thailog 12:18, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per everyone. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 12:37, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per LL & KFB. --I'm The Bos Wall 14:00, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Definitely, as Lostris said, most of the information is speculation, and what little confirmed information there is, isn't very useful. Annawantimes (Talk) 14:10, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I agree and it is very speculative. Kuzonkid7 (wallcontribs) 23:25, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Speculative and not canon. Dcasawang1wall 03:53, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — How is it speculating anything I pulled all information straight from the comic? It said she uses it as a whip and she was able to bind with it. That is all it says basicly and it was said that she manipulates her own shadow. The only part that was speculation was the mention about the Avatar Cycle and how it is likely she is the only Shadowbender and that she was introduced as the shadowbender while everyone else was introduced as a (blank)bender, excluding the guy who could bend cookie dough. It has the title at the page saying that it is not canon. I don't think it should be removed, if theres a problem with speculation, than remove anything you think is speculation. Skarrj (wallcontribs) 09:41, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

White Lotus sentries' quarters

Merge Merge — These quarters are a building on Air Temple Island, and as such it seems more logical to me to merge the info on here with the Air Temple Island page. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 10:14, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — The length is rather reasonable enough to warrant an article; But in terms of significance, no (The same goes to Airbending training arena). Personally, I prefer merging them. If someone else took the initiative to propose for a merger, why not? Axiovatar Talk 10:38, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — There is enough information on the page to warrant the standalone article; it's the same case with the Meditation pavilion and the training area below. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 11:26, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

They could stay as they aren't too minute. It's just more logical to have them merged with the island's page, make that page one larger content page, combining every aspect of the island, instead of spreading out the information over three small pages. That's just illogical and doesn't help people who are looking for complete information. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 12:06, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Definitely. The three locations in the Air Temple Island can be merged in this article as they are part of it and they're not significant enough to have their own article. Dcasawang1wall 15:08, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — As per everyone above. Waterbending emblem Water Spout 17:59, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Absolutely, it would fit best on the Air Temple Island article. Annawantimes (Talk) 03:26, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article merged with the Air Temple Island article, and then deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Airbending training area

Merge Merge — This training area is part of Air Temple Island, and as such it seems more logical to me to merge the info on here with the Air Temple Island page. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 10:14, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — See above. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 11:27, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per my vote above. Dcasawang1wall 15:08, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — As per Lady Lostris. Waterbending emblem Water Spout 17:59, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per Lostris, rather than having several short articles, it is better to have a centralized location for bits of Air Temple Island information. Annawantimes (Talk) 03:26, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Agreed. This should merge with the main article. It can always be re-split if we get enough information to justify an extra page, which I don't see happening. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 13:16, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article merged with the Air Temple Island article, and then deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Meditation pavilion

Merge Merge — Same as the others. Although it could stand alone, for logical reasoning and easy accessible information, it seems better to merge is with the Air Temple Island page, so that everyone looking for information about the island, doesn't need to click at least 4 links now to read all the information we have about the island. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 12:08, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per my vote above. Dcasawang1wall 15:08, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — As per Lady Lostris. Waterbending emblem Water Spout 18:00, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per Lostris. So now we're talking in terms of significance and convenience, huh? How ironic... Axiovatar Talk 03:15, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — To me it's pointless to have it's own page when it can be compiled and described. --  Ianbernard  Wall  Hawky Awards  Facebook  03:17, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — It can easily contain the same information and be added to the Air Temple Island article; it may garner more readers there, as well. Annawantimes (Talk) 03:26, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Agreed, just needs to become part of Air Temple Island page. The Ultimate Waterbender 13:34, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article merged with the Air Temple Island article, and then deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

High Sage

Delete Delete — Not relevant enough to have an article. Dcasawang1wall

Delete Delete — Per DC. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 19:51, April 18, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I tried improving it, but there is too much speculation to be considered a proper article. --I'm The Bos Wall 20:05, April 18, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Yes, very speculative. As a random note; the profile image for it seems more of a pic of Azula than him. :) Vulmen (talkEoK) 02:04, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Most of the information it irrelevant and a bit speculative, plus the history section seems to revolve mostly around Zuko and Azula. Annawantimes (Talk) 02:08, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Speculation. – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 02:09, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I expanded it a bit and took out the false information. It is still a rather short article and we can say that it isn't very relevant, but on the other hand, what relevancy have pages like Tahn's sister that are allowed to stay? To me, it's good enough as it is now. Plus, it's one extra character for our encyclopedia. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 09:27, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I think it should be kept, since it is a character page. We keep all the islands and animals that were never seen, only mentioned, in the series. This guy is actually important. He was also seen in a few episodes. Until pheasant squires, etc. are removed, I think it's absolutely fine to keep this page. Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM)http://mob1255.photobucket.com/albums/hh621/MateyYanakiev/1334279415.gif 12:20, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — For the purposes of being consistent, per Lostris. The 888th Avatar (talk) 12:59, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — After seeing he appeared in 306 also, I think we can keep it. Dcasawang1wall 14:32, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — With my original vote now invalid, and seeing the new state of the article, it can stay. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 14:33, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — It's factual enough now that its been expanded. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message meRead my fanon) Aang Cosmic Toph-DoBS-2 23:23, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — With the expansion, and seeing that he appeared more than once, the article looks a bit better. Come to think of it, this guy is also quite notable from an in-universe POV, so I have no problem with it staying. Annawantimes (Talk) 01:21, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I thought it was fine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1337BenderBoss (wallcontribs) 8:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article kept.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Yuan (currency)

Delete Delete — The information on this page is just a copy of the information on the Currency page. We don't have separate pages for the other nation's currencies, so I don't see why we need one for this. HAMMEROFTHOR 22:21, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — As of now, the yuan hasn't been expanded on quite enough for it to warrant its own page. I believe that later on that it would be a very useful page, as the use of the yuan in United Republic essentially marks a major shift from using metal coinage to using banknote denominations. For now, it's very poor and relatively useless. Waterbending emblem Water Spout 22:24, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Page deleted/merged with currency.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Amon's Abilities

Delete Delete — This is invaild to have this, the abilities info should be in the Amon article, I suggest deletion. Thanks! Sshalwani (wallcontribs) 23:21, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — This is invaild too, the Amon Specuation, that all should be in the Amon article. Deletion should be done! Sshalwani (wallcontribs) 23:25, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per Sshalwani. Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM)http://mob1255.photobucket.com/albums/hh621/MateyYanakiev/1334279415.gif 23:36, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article made into a redirect.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Kangaroo Island

Delete Delete — Kangroo Island - mentioned in the fourth episode of ATLA, I think we should not mention this because I don't see something that should be added. If prove then it should be kept but if mentioned, I think it should be deleted. Sshalwani (wallcontribs) 23:46, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — As per all the other short articles that have only been mentioned before and subjugated to a VfD, this helps shape the Avatar Universe, as we now know that there is a place called "Kangaroo Island", wherever it may be. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 22:38, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — I don't see a reason to delete it. It may be a made-up place, but it also may not be made up, and there's no harm in having an article about a place that may exist, in my opinion at least.  Technology Wizard  Wall  Contribs  05:59, April 23, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — "Notable from an in-universe perspective." – Natsu11 · (wallNanatsu no Taizai) 03:09, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — According to Avatar Extras, Kangaroo Island does not exist. Uiop60 01:52, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — if that's the case, then I vote to delete. —Haybernathy 01:51, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per Uiop60. If it doesn't exist, we're only creating a lie for others to read. Axiovatar Talk 01:56, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — If the place doesn't exist, there shouldn't be a page for it, that's like having a page for speculation. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 11:04, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — As soon as Aang said it in the ep, I figured it was fake. Especially with Bumi's "let's carry this joke forward" behavior. Yeah; delete it. Vulmen (talkEoK) 02:16, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Hehe, you don't walk away from that article with much ^^. If it doesn't exist, I definitely say delete it. Annawantimes (Talk) 02:35, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article made into a redirect.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Fire Lord robes

Delete Delete — To me, this reminds me of the former Azula's sleeping robe page -- it's an insufficient article on a piece of clothing. I say either delete or merge into Fire Lord. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 01:49, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per KFB, I'm for merging. Powerfullest (wallcontribs) 01:55, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — If the Fire Lord headpiece has its own page, why shouldn't the robes? Plus, the robes' design has changed over time. -DarkKnightRises 02:00, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — I vote delete. I don't really think this page is necessary: there was never any spoken importance of the robes in the series, and this situation does seem a lot like Azula's sleeping robes... there just isn't enough information to fill a decent sized article. I don't even think it particularly needs to be merged: the robes have changed over the years, while the headpiece was passed down--while the style remains the same, the robes themselves do not and thus should not be an article. MibuWolf 02:09, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — I can see this article fit below the History section in Fire Lord. Axiovatar Talk 02:13, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Merge it. Not in its entirety of course; that might be a bit too far detail. But maybe simply highlight on some of the higher points. Such as the differences between each Fire Lord, that they didn't all wear the exact same style. Vulmen (talkEoK) 03:12, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Not enough to warrant its own page, but definitely something worth mentioning on the Fire Lord's page and the fashion page. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 11:04, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Relevant enough to be mentioned in the Fashion in the WoA and the Fire Lord articles, but not quite enough for an entire article of its own. I say merge. Annawantimes (Talk) 02:31, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article merged with Fire Lord.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Trolley

Merge Merge — This article doesn't consist of much; just a few sentences containing rather irrelevant information and a a few trivia points, which are a bit speculative. I think it should be merged mostly with the Transportation in the World of Avatar article, with perhaps a bit of information about it in the Republic City article, but at this point I don't think it is relevant enough for its own article. Annawantimes (Talk) 05:03, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — ^^I think that's a good idea. ExplosionsHurtPeople (wallcontribs) 04:34, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Absolutely. Per Annawan. Dcasawang1wall 04:37, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — I concur. The amount of content in it clearly does not warrant a page. Axiovatar Talk 04:39, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — I think it should be merged with Transportaion in the World of Avatar. It would better serve a purpose there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tophrules1132 (wallcontribs) 05:03, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — It's worth being mention, but there is just not enough significant information to warrant its own page. To get that page up to standard, we would have to draw too much information of the real world's trolleys. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 15:07, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Agreed per reasons above. AteldaKony 2012 20:59, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article was merged and deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Moped

For the same reasons as Trolley, we don't have enough info on the Moped for it to remain as an article. We should merge it into Transportation in the World of Avatar as we would Trolley. --I'm The Bos Wall 20:52, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge MergeI'm The Bos Wall 20:52, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Definitely – it may also be worth mentioning in the Automobiles article. Annawantimes (Talk) 20:55, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per Bos. Matey Y. (wallA:TLoM)http://mob1255.photobucket.com/albums/hh621/MateyYanakiev/1334279415.gif 20:56, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per Bos. It's worth having, just not as its own article. MibuWolf 20:56, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Agreed per Bos and Anna. Powerfullest (wallcontribs) 20:58, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Agreed. AteldaKony 2012 20:59, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — Per everyone. HAMMEROFTHOR 21:02, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — I think of a note of it could be placed in the Future Industries article too. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 21:07, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Merge Merge — It should be in the Future Industries and Transportation in the World of Avatar Rydersilver (wallcontribs) 21:39, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Keep Keep — common' info will pour in, it's a little early to make judges since it's the first chapter it has apeared. Just wait. User:Tonekai

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Article was merged and deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Zuko's daughter

Delete Delete — This page really has no information. The only thing we can say about her is that she assumed the throne in 167 AG and a list of her relatives. There will definitely be a page for her in the future, but I don't really see the need of having a practically empty page now. All the information there has already been said on Zuko's page and on the Fire Lords page. Lady Lostris vstf (talkHotN) 08:33, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Per Lady. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk Katara Sprite Season 3http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/vv319/flutflutflyer/KataangSig.png 11:59, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Delete Delete — Agreed. We don't know anything yet. Dcasawang1wall 15:37, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
Page was deleted.
Please do not edit this discussion.