|
This is a page archive.
Please do not add or remove any content from it. (21,673 bytes)
|
Gene Luen Yang[]
11-9-2017[]
<gallery> File:Gene Yang.png|Current image File:Gene Yang proposal.png|Proposed replacement #1 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposal will be new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
Ok this is insanely straight forward. The dude's eyes actually look open. Plus it's more of a headshot than a full on body shot which is always more desirable. – Srijay K • TechFilmer 01:15, November 9, 2017 (UTC)
Kiernan Shipka[]
11-11-2017[]
<gallery> File:Kiernan Shipka.png|Current image File:Kiernan Shipka Proposal.png|Proposed replacement #1 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Image will not be changed. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
I'm proposing this largely because she looks to be about nine in her current picture, and seeing how she just turned 18, I think it's only fair to update her picture to the one from her Wikipedia page. 
AvatarAang7 (My wall - My fanon) 17:10, November 11, 2017 (UTC)
- Approved for discussion.
- I'm rather neutral on this.
- I can see the reasoning for the change, but I don't see the need for the change; considering she voiced the series three years ago when she was still a child, it sort of makes sense to also show her as one. Lady Lostris /
SOAP 18:25, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, in that case, I feel like I should point out that according to Wikipedia, the proposal was taken in 2014. And even if, the current isn't bad or anything, it's just more that I feel like it should be updated to a more current picture.
AvatarAang7 (My wall - My fanon) 20:44, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
- I'm gonna say that we don't update the photo, if anything just because it sets the precedent that every actor should have an up to date picture. People like Zach Tyler Eisen don't have an up to date photo and I really really don't want to set that precedent. – Srijay K • TechFilmer 21:28, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, in that case, I feel like I should point out that according to Wikipedia, the proposal was taken in 2014. And even if, the current isn't bad or anything, it's just more that I feel like it should be updated to a more current picture.
Jargala Omo[]
2-8-2018[]
<gallery> File:Jargala.png|Current image File:Jargala Omo proposal 1.png|Proposed replacement #1 File:Jargala Omo proposal 2.png|Proposed replacement #2 File:Jargala Omo Proposal 3.png|Proposed replacement #3 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposal #3 will be the new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
I think that the change of the image is obvious, as the currently doesn't give us a clear image of Jargala. I have chosen this one because, by reading the comic, I thought one of these are perfect suitable for the character (I don't have any preference between 1 or 2, I'm neutral). {{subst:Usuario:Kyawaterbender/autosig}} 19:17, February 8, 2018 (UTC)
- Approved for discussion.
- A change is definitely needed due to obvious reasons, but I am wondering (I haven't read the comic myself yet) if there are other images of her available as well. I find the angle in both images to be lacking. They're both still better than the current, however, so if there are no other suitable images available, then I vote for #1 since at least that one's a semi-frontal complete head shot. Lady Lostris / SOAP 19:02, February 13, 2018 (UTC)
- Since you asked, I went through her two scenes again, and I found the third proposal, which I took the liberty of adding here. This is the most frontal shot of her that is not from so far that you can't make out any detail, but I will say that proposal 1 is better when it comes to detail than this. I'm not 100% sure which should count for more, but I do think #3 is the best one so far. AvatarAang7 (My wall - My fanon) 14:58, February 15, 2018 (UTC)
- Since you asked, I went through her two scenes again, and I found the third proposal, which I took the liberty of adding here. This is the most frontal shot of her that is not from so far that you can't make out any detail, but I will say that proposal 1 is better when it comes to detail than this. I'm not 100% sure which should count for more, but I do think #3 is the best one so far.
Aaron Ehasz[]
4-27-2018[]
<gallery> File:Aaron Ehasz.png|Current image File:Aaron Ehasz proposal.png|Proposed replacement </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposed will be the new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
The current picture is just a plain black-and-white picture, so not really colorful. I think the proposal would fit in better with the wiki's overall bright colored themes and this picture also happens to be more recent. Korra2000 (wall • contribs)
Azula[]
7-24-2018[]
<gallery> File:Azula.png|Current image File:Azula proposal.png|Proposed replacement #1 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Image will not be changed. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
My proposed image doesn't have other people in the background and displays more of Azula's dark, cunning personality if you ask me. Her entire head is visible, too. -- Minnichi「BSST • Fanon」
19:41, June 24, 2018 (UTC)
- Approved for discussion. I'll have to oppose, however. While it is true that the proposed image shows more of Azula's likeness, her sideways glare and lopsided smirk makes for an odd profile angle and gives her a sort of cartoonish look. In other words: she looks weird. ― Thailog 23:30, June 24, 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think she looks weird. I like the fact that she is alone and there is fire behind her. Dcasawang1 • wall 00:12, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
- Against it, per Thailog. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:17, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with Thailog as well, the very slight smirk of the current shows her personality off better than the more cartoony look of the proposal. AvatarAang7 (My wall - My fanon) 16:44, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with Thailog as well, the very slight smirk of the current shows her personality off better than the more cartoony look of the proposal.
- Against it, per Thailog. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:17, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think she looks weird. I like the fact that she is alone and there is fire behind her. Dcasawang1 • wall 00:12, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
I'll support this one per Minn's proposal. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message me • Read my fanon) 
20:42, June 26, 2018 (UTC)
Zuko[]
7-24-2018[]
<gallery> File:Zuko.png|Current image File:Zuko proposal.png|Proposed replacement #1 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposed will be the new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
The current image has a cluttered background, and to me the lightning is too dark and contrasted. -- Minnichi「BSST • Fanon」 19:24, June 24, 2018 (UTC)
- Approved for discussion and support. ― Thailog 23:30, June 24, 2018 (UTC)
- I agree. Contrast is better in the proposed picture. Dcasawang1 • wall 00:12, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
- Support, per proposal. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:17, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
- I have to disagree here. Yes, the lighting is more even in the proposal, but I feel like that makes him look weirdly flat and featureless. I also don't like that his hair is a little longer in the proposal, covering even more of his face than it already is in the current, which isn't helped by the fact that it's just a little bit further away, making it even more difficult to discern details. And I might even argue that the shadows of the current do something to accentuate Zuko's dual nature, which is the most important part of his character. AvatarAang7 (My wall - My fanon) 16:51, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
- I have to disagree here. Yes, the lighting is more even in the proposal, but I feel like that makes him look weirdly flat and featureless. I also don't like that his hair is a little longer in the proposal, covering even more of his face than it already is in the current, which isn't helped by the fact that it's just a little bit further away, making it even more difficult to discern details. And I might even argue that the shadows of the current do something to accentuate Zuko's dual nature, which is the most important part of his character.
- Support, per proposal. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:17, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
- I agree. Contrast is better in the proposed picture. Dcasawang1 • wall 00:12, June 25, 2018 (UTC)
I oppose as well. He looks a little awkward to me, with the shot not being as centered as the current profile image. His hair, per AA7 is a little too long and he does appear to look a bit expressionless. Tono555 
16:03, June 26, 2018 (UTC)
- After thinking it over, I oppose for the same reasons as AA7. The lighting contrast and basic expression of the current image represent Zuko's character pretty well. --AvatarRokus Ghost (Message me • Read my fanon) 20:40, June 26, 2018 (UTC)
Turf Wars[]
8-12-2018[]
<gallery> File:Turf Wars cover.png|Current image File:Turf Wars hardcover.png|Proposed replacement #1 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposal will be the new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
Per other pages, once the library edition cover of the graphic novels is released that should be used on the page for the trilogy. Fire 
Ferret 20:31, August 12, 2018 (UTC)
Irene Koh[]
9-2-2018[]
<gallery> File: Irene Koh.png|Current image </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposal 1 will be the new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
The current image is quite long and has Koh winking and wearing costume ears. I feel like a more serious image is probably better suited for her article, as I couldn't find promotional headshots when I grabbed the original image so I settled for a twitter selfie, but now more professional images are available I think we should use those instead. Koh typically uses #1 as her official photo at current events like FlameCon and Korra showings, but she has used #2 as well and I feel like it's better suited as an infobox since her head is facing straightforward and I think she has a more neutral expression, and in addition I think the image quality is slightly better. Regardless I kept both so there would be options in case other people preferred one over the other. Fire Ferret 01:34, September 2, 2018 (UTC)
- Approved for discussion.
- I have a preference for #1 as #2 feels a bit mugshot-like to me. Though either proposals are better than the current. Lady Lostris / SOAP 11:25, September 3, 2018 (UTC)
- Leaning towards the second one as it seems more infoboxy. Still, remarkedly better than the original. – Srijay K • TechFilmer 17:42, September 6, 2018 (UTC)
- I support the first proposal. The second one is too weird looking for me. Like a passport photo or something of the sort which is a bit awkward. Tono555 01:53, September 7, 2018 (UTC)
- I'm for the first proposal, since I agree with the passport/mugshot criticism. AvatarAang7 (My wall - My fanon) 07:11, September 8, 2018 (UTC)
- I'm for the first proposal, since I agree with the passport/mugshot criticism.
- I support the first proposal. The second one is too weird looking for me. Like a passport photo or something of the sort which is a bit awkward. Tono555
- Leaning towards the second one as it seems more infoboxy. Still, remarkedly better than the original. – Srijay K • TechFilmer 17:42, September 6, 2018 (UTC)
Zuko[]
9-8-2018[]
<gallery> File:Film - Zuko headshot.png|Current image File:Zuko 1 proposal.png|Proposed replacement #1 File:Zuko 2 proposal.png|Proposed replacement #2 File:Zuko 3 proposal.png|Proposed replacement #3 File:Zuko 3 brightened proposal.png|Proposed replacement #4 File:Film - Zuko proposal 5.png|Proposed replacement #5 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposal 5 will be the new image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
It is almost impossible to discern Zuko's features in the current image. The first proposal is better, though unfortunately his mouth is ajar. The second one is also not perfect, but given that his features make him easier to see, it is still more appropriate than the current image. Frui (🌹 • 🐝 • 🐝🐝) 20:00, September 8, 2018 (UTC)
- I think #1 is better, even if his mouth is open, at least he seems angsty in it and he's the focus of the shot. Fire Ferret 22:00, September 8, 2018 (UTC)
Reopening because uh... i put the wrong pic as the current image. whoops. i now don't know. im still partial to replacement 1 but that's because im not a fan of the stark blue background. that being said, his scar is nice and visible in the current. Frui (🌹 • 🐝 • 🐝🐝) 19:39, September 18, 2018 (UTC)
- Lol no problem, I actually prefer the current because I think the lighting is better and gives us a greater view of his face. Fire Ferret 19:42, September 18, 2018 (UTC)
- I think my biggest issue is that the current images are so horribly "color-corrected". Proposal 3 is the same image but taken as a direct screenshot, and it makes a huge difference. Given that we have a 'don't edit images' policy on the wiki, I think that it should be a comparison between changing the current one to either a different image, or changing it to how it actually looks in the film. If that makes sense... Of course, it can be brightened a little, and I may do that so we can actually see his features... but at the moment, the current image is not representative of Zuko in the film. Frui (🌹 • 🐝 • 🐝🐝) 19:57, September 18, 2018 (UTC)
Reopening this with option #5. I admit that the slanted angle isn't ideal, but the lighting, coloring, and overall visualisation of Zuko is better than in the other options, which I find to outweigh the downside of the side angle. Lady Lostris / SOAP 22:12, October 6, 2018 (UTC)
Iroh[]
9-8-2018[]
<gallery> File:Film - Iroh.png|Current image </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposal will be the new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
The current image of Iroh makes it difficult to make out some of his features due to the lighting. It is easier to see him in the proposed, though I don't think either of them are perfect. Frui (🌹 • 🐝 • 🐝🐝) 20:00, September 8, 2018 (UTC)
Aang[]
9-8-2018[]
<gallery> File:Film - Aang.png|Current image File:Aang 1 proposal.png|Proposed replacement #1 File:Aang 2 proposal.png|Proposed replacement #2 File:Aang 3 proposal.png|Proposed replacement #3 File:Aang 4 proposal.png|Proposed replacement #4 File:Aang 2 proposal colorgraded.png|Proposed replacement #5 [graded #2] File:Aang 4 proposal colorgraded.png|Proposed replacement #6 [graded #4] </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposal 6 will be the new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
Frankly, any image is better than the current. Currently, the image is a hot pixelated mess. While the proposals are slightly darker than the current, I believe Aang's features are much more prominent in proposal 2. Additionally, the slight smile is more indicative of his nature. Proposal 2 or 4 are better suited to be his image, imo, though I added the other two as extra options. Frui (🌹 • 🐝 • 🐝🐝) 20:00, September 8, 2018 (UTC)
- I like 4. We don't have to really worry about Aang reflecting his movie personality since he doesn't have much of one and he's looking straight on at the camera. Fire Ferret 22:00, September 8, 2018 (UTC)
Ok, so the darkness in Proposal 2 and Proposal 4 (which I saw as the clear winners) was irritating me so I just tweaked the exposure, contrast, highlights, and shadows in the photo for some basic color grading. Nothing fancy at all, but they are much better to look at now. I vote 5 (really 2 graded), because Shyamalan at least intended on depicting him as happy and consequently, 5 serves as a better infobox image. – Srijay K • TechFilmer 03:40, September 11, 2018 (UTC)
- With the updated lighting I like #6. Fire Ferret 19:23, September 18, 2018 (UTC)
- I like proposal 6 as well. Tono555 01:37, September 19, 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed with proposal 6. AvatarAang7 (My wall - My fanon) 20:25, September 19, 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed with proposal 6.
- I like proposal 6 as well. Tono555
Lauren MacMullan[]
10-12-2018[]
<gallery> File:Lauren MacMullan.png|Current image File:Lauren Macmullan 1.png|Proposed replacement #1 File:Lauren MacMullan 2.png|Proposed replacement #2 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposal 1 will be the new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
The current image is god awful. I don't have much of a preference between the two proposals but I'll take anything above the current, I think the reasons why its undesirable are clearly apparent. Fire Ferret 03:55, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
- I definitely prefer proposal #1. Her face looks a little less clean on the second one, and the first one is a more professional shot. --Tono555 04:02, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
- Proposal #1 does look more professional, though I am little concerned about it looking slightly grainy in the infobox. That said, it is the best of three so has my vote. HAMMEROFTHØR (wall) • 15:02, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
- Agree with Tono and HoT, proposal 1 is the best one here. Perhaps it could be cropped to be a bit more square, but that's a detail. AvatarAang7 (My wall - My fanon) 15:30, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
- Agree with Tono and HoT, proposal 1 is the best one here. Perhaps it could be cropped to be a bit more square, but that's a detail.
- Proposal #1 does look more professional, though I am little concerned about it looking slightly grainy in the infobox. That said, it is the best of three so has my vote. HAMMEROFTHØR (wall) • 15:02, October 12, 2018 (UTC)
Tiger monkey[]
10-19-2018[]
<gallery> File:Tiger monkey.png|Current image File:Tiger Monkey.png|Proposed replacement #1 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Infobox image will not be changed. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
The current image is a picture of a tiger monkey doll, not an actual tiger monkey. The proposal is not ideal, it's concept art and I edited out a distracting fin from a fish at the top, but it is at least actually the animal that the article is about, rather than being a toy of the animal the article discusses. Fire Ferret 21:49, October 19, 2018 (UTC)
- I went back and forth with this one on which image to support, but I think overall I prefer the current image for a few reasons:
- the comics are considered canon, and so I think a canon image (where one exists) is preferable for a profile image over concept art
- the proposed image looks very rough, compared to the current image which is of a higher quality
- there are some features of the animal that are not as clearly shown in the concept art as in the current image
- I agree that neither image is great and the current being a toy of the animal is an obvious weakness, but based on the points above I still think the current image is a better choice. HAMMEROFTHØR (wall) • 12:05, October 21, 2018 (UTC)
Jack DeSena[]
10-28-2018[]
<gallery> File:Jack DeSena.png|Current image File:Jack DeSena proposal.png|Proposed replacement #1 </gallery>
| This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was: |
|---|
| Proposal will be the new infobox image. |
| Please do not edit this discussion. |
The current image is too small in size for our infoboxes, making it look all blurry. The proposed image, while having a downside of the top of the head being cut off, fixes the size issue, while being an overall nice image for the rest. Lady Lostris / SOAP 21:14, October 27, 2018 (UTC)
- Support per reasons given. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FireFerret (wall • contribs) 05:56, October 28, 2018 (UTC)
I support the proposal as well. It is a more updated version also, so it's great. Tono555 
14:57, October 28, 2018 (UTC)