Featured blog posts are blog posts of a high quality written to a professional standard; the newest display together with the latest Avatar news on the main page. Featured blog posts are chosen by the community with the guidance of some basic criteria. They are nominated and voted upon on this page.

Once a user has five of their blog posts attain featured status, they become a featured blogger and may use {{User featured blogger}} on their user page.

Click here to skip straight to the voting.

Contents 1 Requirements 2 Procedures 3 Voting 3.1 All of TAD's demotivational posts 3.2 Zuko Alone: Possible Allusions to the Book of Genesis? 3.3 Avatar Wiki:Yearbook 3.3.1 Support 3.3.2 Neutral 3.3.3 Oppose 3.4 So, why ruin the party? 3.4.1 Support 3.4.2 Neutral 3.4.3 Oppose 3.5 The Ultimate Shipping War! 3.5.1 Support 3.5.2 Neutral 3.5.3 Oppose 3.5.4 Comments 3.6 Aang vs Goku 3.6.1 Support 3.6.2 Neutral 3.6.3 Oppose 3.7 Sympathy & Empathy, An Attempt at a Suki Character Analysis, and the "Tokka" friendship's possible relation to the rising Equalist tension 3.7.1 Support 3.7.2 Neutral 3.7.3 Oppose 3.8 Tolerance on Avatar Wiki 3.9 Vulmen's Katara Blog 3.10 My Ultimate Show of Devotion; IBK's Azula Character Review/Analysis 3.11 Thoughts/theories on LOK characters 3.12 The Wiki from Azulazulazula's Perspective; High points, low points, and apologies

Requirements Edit

In general, blog posts should be judged on the follow criteria:

• Quality or novelty of idea proposed
• Clarity of expression and soundness of logic
• Adherence to the topic of Avatar or Avatar Wiki
• The "thought provocation" factor

Procedures Edit

Support —

Neutral —

Oppose —

1. Users nominate a blog post authored by another user to be featured. Users may not nominate their own blog posts.
2. Immediately, users may vote {{support}}, {{neutral}} or {{oppose}} to this post being featured, providing a reason for their position.
3. 24 hours after its nomination, if there have been ten votes overall or more and if there is consensus in favour, the blog post will be featured.
4. If the two conditions above are not met by the 24 hour mark, voting will continue until there are ten votes overall. If there is consensus in favour, the blog post will be featured then.
5. If voting is still short of ten votes after two weeks, the blog post will not be featured.

Voting Edit

All of TAD's demotivational posts Edit

1. Support — TAD and her demotes are just something that this community can't live without anymore. They are incredibly funny and innovative, as she is the only on with such blog post -only natural of course, as she is and will always be the wiki's resident joker. There are so many of her demotes that deserve to be featured, but I chose this one because 1. It was extremely funny and 2. It was the demote that made me start reading all the demotes, so that is just that extra bit of value for me. so let's just get them all featured in one swipe (the idea came from Dc and an IRC convo that followed it :-) ). Her writing style and humor combine into this beauty of a blog post series that is just a must read for everyone. Lady Lostris (talk • HotN) 10:08, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
2. Support — Need anyone say more. Taddles has brought something new, hilarious, fresh, fun, insert-positive-adjective-here, and wonderful to the wiki. _{Rage  Of  Fluffy}
3. Support — I've said it before and I'll say it again: TAD's standard of writing is just consistently brilliant. The 888th Avatar (talk) 10:33, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
4. Support — TAD's demotes are always funny and masterly written. Actually all of them should be featured. ;) Dcasawaang1 (talk) 10:38, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
5. Support — – Natsu · (wall • A Answers • T3I Wiki) 11:03, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
6. Support — If it were any other candidate, I'd be a little peeved there's only one to choose from right now. It's like a dictatorship where the dictator is a really cool person. Uiop60 (talk • contribs) 11:08, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
7. Support — AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 11:22, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
8. Support —BlackMonkey ^{Talk - Rhythm} 11:24, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
9. Support — They make me laugh, every time. Just out of curiosity, what is the pic in the user template? It's too tiny for these old eyes to make out. DesertDog (talk) 11:55, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

   It's Katara rallying the Earthbenders at the prison rig :-) Lady Lostris (talk • HotN) 11:58, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

10. Support — Just because I'm a fan of the blogs... my only gripe with this is that it seems a tad unfair (no pun intended), since it isn't one of the blogs being nominated, but EVERY single one. Easy way to get to featured blog status. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 12:22, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

    I originally nominated only the demote for 114, but then Dc said they should all be nominated and 888th agreed in IRC when we were saying that, so hence the upgrade to all the blogs. It saves us the time to vote for this over and over again as -to borrow 888th's words- "TAD's standard of writing is just consistently brilliant.", and would have been nominated anyway. Lady Lostris (talk • HotN) 13:48, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

    So in my mind, should this entire series win, I believe it should only be considered as one blog win, and not 5+, as it would be extremely easy for one to attain featured blogger status, setting a precedent by allowing a series to be nominated and win. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 13:59, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

    This will count for all the blogs, but I don't really see what's the problem here as there isn't really something to win here. As I understood it, this featured thing works like the A/B class articles, so yours can still be featured as well. Lady Lostris (talk • HotN) 14:03, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

    That's not the point I'm trying to make here. To put it simply, if TAD's blog series wins, it would be as if 20+ blogs became featured at the same time, instead of just one. Get my drift? Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 14:06, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

    I could've made a long list of her blogs, true, but what's the point of making people vote 22 times i it can be done at once? They are all brilliant and very much deserving of the featured status. Glancing at the raving comments of her blogs, it was a certainty that these would all be featured, doing it like this just saved a lot of time for everyone. Lady Lostris (talk • HotN) 14:11, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

11. Support — Oh definitely. Brilliantly thought out and written and something to add humor to your day, even when you're feeling down. The Ultimate Waterbender
12. Support — Yes! TAD's demotes are hilarious! Aang20791 Fanons 20:33, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
13. Support — Any time one of TAD's demotes comes out; the entire wiki scrambles. :) Vulmen (talk • EoK) 21:48, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
All of TAD's demotivational posts have been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Zuko Alone: Possible Allusions to the Book of Genesis? Edit

1. Support — When this blog was written, it was pretty much was destined to be featured. It's insane depth and thought compares the stories of Zuko Alone to that of the Bible, and once again, H-Man Havoc goes over the top with another complex perspective to share with the community. BlackMonkey ^{Talk - Rhythm} 11:38, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
2. Support — When I started reading this blog post I just couldn't stop. It's intriguing, interesting, informative, and even intellectual (alliteration intended). Most of all, through all of those smart-person adjectives, it's really fun to read and reflect on. --Krazykid51 23:55, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
3. Support — Fits all four requirements and gives good perspective. --AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 01:27, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
4. Support — Quite a thoughtful perspective and meets the criteria, even if I don't necessarily agree with it. :) The 888th Avatar (talk) 04:52, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
5. Support — For the sake of objectiveness: Per 888th. This blog meets the set criteria to become featured, although I don't agree with it. Lady Lostris (talk • HotN) 10:30, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
6. Support — Per Krazy. Dcasawaang1 - (talk) 23:44, November 6, 2011 (UTC)
7. Support — This was a very in-depth, analytical blog that brought up some interesting points and observations. The Ultimate Waterbender 15:29, November 9, 2011 (UTC)
8. Support — Per all. – Natsu · (wall • A Answers • T3I Wiki) 15:33, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

   Just 2 more votes needed... Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 12:28, November 10, 2011 (UTC)

9. Support — Per Ultimate. Aang20791 Fanons 23:47, November 11, 2011 (UTC)
10. Support — Makes you think, very deeply thought out and written, perfect for the award. 02:18, November 18, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"Zuko Alone: Possible Allusions to the Book of Genesis?" has been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Avatar Wiki:Yearbook Edit

Support Edit

1. Support — Awesome idea. 'Nuff said --AvatarMonarchist 18:05, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
2. Support — This is so cool! --Firebender896 18:50, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
3. Support — This sounds awesome! (This is Slash, mission complete! (talk • contribs) 20:43, November 17, 2011 (UTC))

Neutral Edit

1. Neutral — Sounds like a lot of work, but I don't see any harm in it. Have fun . . . I guess. DesertDog (talk) 06:04, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
2. Neutral — A cool idea, but does not fit the guidelines. --BlackMonkey ^{Talk - Rhythm} 02:22, November 19, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose Edit

1. Oppose — Does not satisfy criteria number two sufficiently. Also, intended to a substantial project rather than putting forward an idea. It's a novel concept, but it's not in line with the requirements. Sorry... The 888th Avatar (talk) 05:24, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
2. Oppose — Per 888. Criteria #2's fulfillment is ambiguous at best... perhaps because it is simply a think tank blog, without too much base substance. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 06:07, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
3. Oppose — Per 888. Not to discourage the idea, but it doesn't fit in for a featured blog post. --AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 08:27, November 18, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"Avatar Wiki: Yearbook" has not been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

So, why ruin the party? Edit

Support Edit

1. hell yeah i support — This is the internet for chrissake! What's up with all the puritanism? I mean, come on. My homeboy Doombringer says it all in his post. We should all support him for his efforts! --AvatarMonarchist 23:34, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral Edit

Oppose Edit

1. Oppose — Not especially thought-provoking, nor extremely high in quality of idea. (At least to me.) Besides, it's really just a request for a change in the Wiki's policy. It either passes or doesn't. There's no need for featuring to me. Free as a Bison (talk • contribs) 21:30, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
2. Oppose — Per Free as a Bison, as well as not especially relevant. The conventions of grammar and formatting aren't especially regarded in the blog. Uiop60 (talk • contribs) 01:29, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
3. Oppose — Doesn't qualify the fourth criteria, "thought provocation". – Natsu · (wall • A Answers • T3I Wiki) 10:25, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
4. Oppose — Attention grabbing if nothing else. Certainly not thought provoking at all. Bassmasta2012 (talk • contribs) 17:50, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
5. Oppose — Per everyone else. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 18:10, December 13, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"So, why ruin the party?" has not been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

The Ultimate Shipping War! Edit

SupportEdit

1. Support — Bahjy1's shipping tournament began in September was officially finished two days ago, and I personally think that a competition like this that was well run and well received for almost three months deserves to be a featured post. No matter how long the blog ran, it always made it's way back to the Avatar Wiki hot spots when another round was started, and the community's ultimate ship has finally (and enjoyably) been found. Long live Kataang. BlackMonkey ^{Talk - Rhythm} 20:48, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
2. if I am allowed to vote, Support — - Thanks BlackMonkey! I didn't see that one coming! Yeah this one was good, but let the community decide. (still : If I am not allowed to vote, please use the <s> tag) --
   • Bahjy1
     • IT IS CALLED TALK AND NOT MESSAGE WALL! SAY NO TO MESSAGE WALL!
     • Blog
     • Fanon
   07:32, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
3. Support — It was really fun. Not everything has to be deep with a greater meaning than what's on the surface. Because shipping is really big part of A:TLA, a shipping war only seems natural. --The 9th thief of lightning. Gold in the sky, silver in the sea, crystals in the earth! 20:57, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
4. Support — - This was soooo much fun and deserves to be nominated! This is Slash, mission complete! 02:13, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

@Slash: As fun as it was, it was not especially thought-provoking, and therefore does not meet the criteria for Featured Blog Post. Free as a Bison (talk • contribs) 12:41, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

1. Oppose — This isn't because I didn't think the blog was a good idea. I just don't see how it was thought-provoking, which is one of the requirements for featured blog posts. --AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 21:08, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
2. Oppose — Sorry, Monkey, but I have to second ARG. Great blog, but not really very thought-provoking. Free as a Bison (talk • contribs) 23:41, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

   What are your defintions of "thought-provoking?" BlackMonkey ^{Talk - Rhythm} 03:48, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

   Encouraging deeper analysis/reflection. This competition, fun as it was, fails to do this on any level. Free as a Bison (talk • contribs) 21:15, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

3. Oppose — Although an entertaining idea, it wasn't really a well though out idea of himself, it was just a competition, and in this light, I do not feel that it answers to the set criteria to be featured. Lady Lostris (talk • HotN) 09:01, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
4. Oppose — Agreed as well. There wasn't really insight here, it was just a "pick your side" competition. Vulmen (talk • EoK) 22:32, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
5. Oppose — Per ARG. – Natsu · (wall • A Answers • T3I Wiki) 11:32, December 20, 2011 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Thanks for everyone who voted, support or oppose. I appreciate your thoughts, actually wasn't expecting it to come here. I am happy I got nominated anyway. --

• Bahjy1
  • IT IS CALLED TALK AND NOT MESSAGE WALL! SAY NO TO MESSAGE WALL!
  • Blog
  • Fanon

13:07, December 20, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"The Ultimate Shipping War!" has not been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Aang vs Goku Edit

Support Edit

1. Support — I nominate this blog post for Featured Blog Posts, this blog looks very good and I say we should feature this blog and we have a good VS crossover battle blog. I say let showdown the begin.-- King Marth 64 (talk • other wikis • blogs) 01:42, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral Edit

Oppose Edit

1. Oppose — The blog is rather short, and again, this is simply a "who would win blog" which isn't really a well thought out idea, more an entertaining pastime for the participants, so I don't feel like it answers to the set criteria to be featured. Lady Lostris (talk • HotN) 09:01, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
2. Oppose — Some random competition blog from March with 6 comments? If you want people to like a blog they've got to know a blog in the first place. BlackMonkey ^{Talk - Rhythm} 12:45, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
3. Oppose — Per Lady and BlackMonkey. It's not what we're looking for. --AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 19:26, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
4. Oppose — These types of blogs were not the purpose for these awards. Vulmen (talk • EoK) 22:31, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
5. Oppose — Per everyone disagreeing with the proposal. Annawantimes (Wall) 20:06, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"Aang vs Goku" has not been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Sympathy & Empathy, An Attempt at a Suki Character Analysis, and the "Tokka" friendship's possible relation to the rising Equalist tension Edit

Support Edit

1. Support — Boy, that's a mouthful. Anyways, I'll make this quick. My reasons for nominating this blog are A. It is incredibly deep, well-thought out, and logical, B. It puts the touchy subject of shipping, as well as the Tokka/Sukka subject very nicely and respectfully, something that is very, very difficult, and C. In general, it meets and exceeds the four requirements. With that, I nominate this for featured blog.深层蓝消防怪物 21:16, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — From what I see it fits all the criteria. --AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 21:20, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support — Lots of thought was put into this blog. BlackMonkey ^{Talk - Rhythm} 21:50, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support — As a long time collaborator and colleague of Toph's Fanboy/MetalArmor, I can safely say that this blog is just the latest in a series of great posts that make you think, and the fact that it deals with the shipping issue from a calm head is good for everyone. Bassmasta2012 (talk • contribs) 03:22, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
5. Very, very strong support — It more than fits the criteria. – Natsu · (wall • A Answers • T3I Wiki) 03:30, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
6. Support — why not support it brings up some good points and is better then other blogs I've seen Plasmabender117 (talk • contribs) 03:26, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
7. Support — Even the title seems to have been given much thought. Annawantimes (Wall) 03:35, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
8. Support — Very intriguing blog :D Seismic Sense Talk 58 Edits! 15:54, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
9. Support — Judging from the title & the length of the blog post, and for the sake of a third successful nomination here at least.. I support. --
   • Bahjy1
     • IT IS CALLED TALK AND NOT MESSAGE WALL! SAY NO TO MESSAGE WALL!
     • Blog
     • Fanon
   16:16, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
10. Support — Toph's Fanboy seems dedicated to quality analysis of a tricky subject, and he does it very well. I hold his work in high regard due to his thoroughness and logical reasoning throughout. He deserves to be recognized for his hard work at sorting out the Tokka confusion on the Wiki, and this blog is a pretty good representation of his efforts. ~Mysteria Femina~ (wall • Girl Genius talk) 01:08, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
11. Support — Not the longest I've read but it is a mouthful... in a good way. Highly detailed and explains its intentions early on, and it meets the criteria. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 01:31, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral Edit

Oppose Edit

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"Sympathy & Empathy, An Attempt at a Suki Character Analysis, and the "Tokka" friendship's possible relation to the rising Equalist tension" has been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Tolerance on Avatar Wiki Edit

1. Support — The 888th Avatar has created a well thought out and well received "wake-up call" of a blog for our fellow Avatar Wiki community to see. I personally have benefited from reading it and I think many others would agree. BlackMonkey ^{Talk - Rhythm} 20:24, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — Per BM --AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 00:05, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support — A powerful message, per BM ~ MibuWolf 00:10, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support — This blog is so great that its quality rather speaks for itself. ~Mysteria Femina~ (wall • Girl Genius talk) 00:19, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
5. Support — Definitely a well-versed article that should wholly cause one to think, indeed reflectively so. Vulmen (talk • EoK) 00:35, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
6. Support — An obviously-needed blog that warns against negatively-changing actions by users. Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem 00:45, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
7. Support — Per all. :) – Natsu · (wall • A Answers • T3I Wiki) 01:08, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
8. Support — Per Vulmen. Dcasawang1 • wall 01:44, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
9. Support — Definitely, it sparked necessary realizations in me, a great blog for the benefit of the wiki. Undoubtedly of Staff quality. ;) Annawantimes (Wall) 03:41, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
10. Support — A must-read for every user, old and new. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk 03:44, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
11. Support — Should be policy. Rassilon of Old ^{(Wall - Help)} 04:12, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"Tolerance on Avatar Wiki" has been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Vulmen's Katara Blog Edit

1. Support — How silly of me to not have thought of this sooner. I, Mysteria Femina, nominate Vulmen's blog about what makes Katara awesome because it is well-written, thorough, clear, intelligent, and insightful. Bravo, Vulmen! ~Mysteria Femina~ (wall • Girl Genius talk) 03:37, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — Absolutely, this is one of the deepest analyses of Katara I've ever seen. The 888th Avatar (talk) 03:39, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support — I'd recommend this reading for anyone who watches Avatar. It will broaden their perspective on Katara. --AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 03:43, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support — And this is not just because I'm a Katara fanboy -- this is a full, in-depth analysis that helps open the eyes of all Avatar fans to what Katara is like, and what makes her what she is. KataraFanboy Send me a messenger hawk 03:44, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
5. Support — In response to Wjxhuang, it's one of the deepest analyses of any character I've ever seen! Rassilon of Old ^{(Wall - Help)} 04:18, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
6. Support — Actually, this is one of the deepest analyses of anything I've ever seen! AKA, Sifu Vulmen is awesome... – Natsu · (wall • A Answers • T3I Wiki) 13:52, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
7. Astronomical Support — Absolutely. *Winks at Bahjy* In protest of the message wall, READ THE SIG! 01:43, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
8. Support — Indubitably. A way belated nomination, this should've been up as the first few to be featured! Good thing Mysteria thought of it. Axiovatar Talk 11:10, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
9. Support — I found this blog interesting to read. I can say it changed the way I looked at Katara from that point thereafter. I support. Annawantimes (Wall) 01:23, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
10. Support — Very good. BlackMonkey ^{Talk - Rhythm} 01:41, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"Analyze This -:- Character Review: Katara" has been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

My Ultimate Show of Devotion; IBK's Azula Character Review/Analysis Edit

1. Support — I thought this was a very analytical examination of the character Azula, with some good humor and a dose of IBK's personality mixed in with it. It shows the deeper side of one of ATLA's most notorious villains. --AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 04:57, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — Indeed it really did cover Azula's personality quite well. :) Vulmen (talk • EoK) 05:06, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
3. No s*** — Of course.*Winks at Bahjy* In protest of the message wall, READ THE SIG! 01:42, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"My Ultimate Show of Devotion; IBK's Azula Character Review/Analysis" has not been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

Thoughts/theories on LOK characters Edit

1. Support — I nominate Necterine's blog about possible relationships in LoK to be featured. It is quite a beautiful analysis, and very thorough. ~Mysteria Femina~ (wall • Girl Genius talk) 00:32, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — I agree. It's very well written, and a very interesting read. —Haybernathy ^talk 03:24, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
3. Very strong support — Quite an interesting analysis. – Natsu · (wall • A Answers • T3I Wiki) 03:25, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support — A very detailed analysis – no doubt the author put some hard work and thought into it. :) Annawantimes (Wall) 03:29, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
5. Support — Loved reading it from the beginning! Great blog post! It just made me more excited about Korra's début, in a sort of "why can't they début it sooner" way... Master Ratava · 熱沓霸師傅 · ^{(Wall · A:TFS · Blog · Contribs)} 19:32, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"Thoughts/theories on LOK characters" has not been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.

The Wiki from Azulazulazula's Perspective; High points, low points, and apologiesEdit

1. Support — I nominate Azulazulazula's blog because it meets all of the requirements a featured blog must meet. While the main idea has been discussed by other users, Azulazulazula's goes in depth and expresses (what I find to be) original ideas. She clearly expresses the good and bad of the wiki in neat, organized sections. Personally, I know the blog made me think if I was guilty of some of the behaviors described on the blog, and I think every user here could benefit form reading it. In conclusion, it is a well-thought out blog that deserves recognition. Necterine411 (talk) Somebody tripped...a Vandal! Twice! 23:49, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — The blog post features the good parts and the bad parts. People need to read that. Matey Y. (wall • A:TLoM) 19:17, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support — A needed wake-up call, and well-written. (PS: Necterine, Azulazulazula is actually a guy...) ~Mysteria Femina~ (wall • Girl Genius talk) 05:20, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support — That's a really good one, for a start; we should have more blog posts like this. Showing each one of ours point of view about AW hierarchy certainly would help improving it for the better. Despite, we shall not confuse hierarchy with well-earned respect, and also with over-estimated point of view opinions and prestige. Each member here should read this, at least to try to control pride and humbleness balance in between the lines of what we post around. (I'm not saying this is something easy to do; I'm not the perfect model of a humble easy-going calm person...) Master Ratava · 熱沓霸師傅 · ^{(Wall · A:TFS · Blog · Contribs)} 09:57, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
5. Support — Per Mysteria Femina. --AvatarRokus Ghost (talk • Energy Saga) 16:36, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
6. Support — Like Mysti said, it's a needed wake-up call, it illustrates the wiki's high and low points quite nicely. Annawantimes (Wall) 22:15, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
7. Support — Definitely support this being featured. HAMMEROFTHOR 22:23, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
8. Support — The issues brought forth in this post have become ever more present and need to be brought to light. Uiop60 19:40, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
9. Support — – Natsu · (wall • A Answers • T3I Wiki) 02:06, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
10. Support — this blog really does tell the ups and downs of the wiki we need more blogs like this to make this place a better community Plasmabender117

This discussion is closed. The result of this discussion was:
"The Wiki from Azulazulazula's Perspective; High points, low points, and apologies" has been featured.
Please do not edit this discussion.